GastroAGI Logo
OverviewBlogsAbout
Trending TopicsConference
Topics/Artificial Intelligence /ACG Delphi Consensus on AI in GI- AMJ Feb.26

ACG Delphi Consensus on AI in GI- AMJ Feb.26

Clinical knowledge base curated and reviewed by GastroAGI TeamLast updated February 1, 2026

Quick Answer

This American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)–led modified Delphi consensus provides a comprehensive framework for responsible integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into gastroenterology, hepatology, and endoscopy practice. A multidisciplinary task force of 32 experts and 12 industry partners reviewed the literature across five domains: endoscopy, clinical/practice management applications, IBD and liver disease, training/education, and ethics/equity.


This American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)–led modified Delphi consensus provides a comprehensive framework for responsible integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into gastroenterology, hepatology, and endoscopy practice. A multidisciplinary task force of 32 experts and 12 industry partners reviewed the literature across five domains: endoscopy, clinical/practice management applications, IBD and liver disease, training/education, and ethics/equity.

Out of 43 proposed statements, 100% ultimately reached consensus (≥70% agreement). In endoscopy, strong evidence supports computer-aided detection (CADe) for improving adenoma detection rates and reducing miss rates in controlled settings, though real-world impact and long-term outcomes (e.g., interval cancer reduction) remain uncertain. The panel emphasizes robust validation using heterogeneous datasets to mitigate bias.

Beyond endoscopy, promising applications include ambient AI scribes, natural language processing for coding, workflow optimization, and prior authorization support. In IBD and hepatology, AI shows potential in improving diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and therapeutic guidance.

Importantly, the consensus stresses that AI should augment—not replace—clinical expertise. Recommendations include structured AI curricula for trainees while preserving independent procedural competence to prevent “deskilling.” Ethical priorities focus on data governance, chain-of-custody protections, bias mitigation, specialty oversight, and equitable reimbursement models.

Future priorities include prospective pragmatic trials, multi-institutional data-sharing consortia, and transparent validation standards to ensure safe, effective, and equitable AI adoption in gastrointestinal practice.

Related Q&A

AI and U.S. Healthcare Costs: NEJM Catalyst | July 2026

Introduction: Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming healthcare through drug discovery, clinical decision support, remote monitoring, and administrative automation. While AI is widely expected to reduce healthcare costs, this perspective argues that current payment models and...

Large AI Models and Healthcare: Nature Medicine | June 2026

Introduction: Large frontier AI models such as GPT-5 and Gemini have achieved impressive results across numerous healthcare benchmarks. However, high benchmark scores alone may not reflect real-world clinical reliability. This study systematically evaluated the robustness...

AI Ethics From Silicon Valley to the Vatican: JAMA | July 2026

Introduction: Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming medicine, but its influence extends far beyond healthcare. This JAMA AI Conversations article explores how AI ethics has become a global societal issue, engaging technology leaders, policymakers, healthcare professionals,...

Physician-Complementing AI in Oncology: The ASCO Post | June 2026

Introduction: Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming oncology, evolving from image interpretation and pathology analysis to supporting complex clinical decision-making. This perspective argues that AI should enhance the capabilities of oncologists rather than replace their expertise....

AI-Based Clinical Trial End Points: A New Era in Drug Development: NEJM AI | July 2026

Introduction Clinical trial endpoints have traditionally relied on expert human interpretation, particularly for pathology-based outcomes. However, variability between observers, cost, and time remain important limitations. This NEJM AI perspective discusses how artificial intelligence is beginning...

Medical AI Assistant: Publication or Medical Device?: NEJM AI | July 2026

Introduction: As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into clinical practice, an important question arises: should AI assistants be regulated as medical devices or viewed as evidence-based clinical methodologies? This NEJM AI perspective proposes a new...

GastroAGI Logo

We are pioneers in clinical intelligence, dedicated to helping gastroenterologists harness the power of artificial intelligence to drive precision, efficiency, and patient growth.

For You

For StudentsFor CliniciansFor ResearchersSoonFor Patients

Core Tools

MELD-Na ScoreChild-PughFIB-4 IndexGlasgow-BlatchfordBISAP Score

Explore

OverviewAboutCalculators
Trending Topics
Conference Briefings
Blog Insights
©GastroAGI 2026
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseMedical Disclaimer