GastroAGI Logo
OverviewBlogsAbout
Trending TopicsConference
Topics/HCC/CRAFITY Score May Guide First-Line Therapy Selection in Unresectable HCC: Liver Cancer | June 2026

CRAFITY Score May Guide First-Line Therapy Selection in Unresectable HCC: Liver Cancer | June 2026

Clinical knowledge base curated and reviewed by GastroAGI TeamLast updated June 1, 2026

Quick Answer

* Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab remains the most widely used first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, while lenvatinib continues to be an important alternative. * This international multicenter study evaluated whether the CRAFITY score can help identify which patients may benefit more from one treatment over the other.


  • Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab remains the most widely used first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, while lenvatinib continues to be an important alternative.
  • This international multicenter study evaluated whether the CRAFITY score can help identify which patients may benefit more from one treatment over the other.
  • The CRAFITY score is based on two simple biomarkers:
  • CRP ≥1 mg/dL
  • AFP ≥100 ng/mL

Patients receive a score of 0, 1, or 2.

  • The analysis included 994 patients treated across Japan and Taiwan, making it one of the largest real-world comparisons of Atezo+Bev and lenvatinib stratified by CRAFITY score.
  • In patients with CRAFITY score 0, progression-free survival and overall survival were similar between Atezo+Bev and lenvatinib.
  • Similar results were observed in patients with CRAFITY score 1, suggesting both treatment options remain reasonable choices in this group.
  • The key finding emerged in patients with CRAFITY score 2, representing the highest-risk subgroup.
  • In CRAFITY-2 patients, lenvatinib achieved significantly longer progression-free survival compared with Atezo+Bev.
  • This suggests that highly inflammatory, biologically aggressive HCC characterized by elevated CRP and AFP may respond less favorably to immunotherapy-based treatment.
  • Overall survival did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups, but progression control clearly favored lenvatinib in the CRAFITY-2 population.
  • The study demonstrated a significant interaction between CRAFITY score and treatment efficacy, supporting the concept of biomarker-driven treatment selection.
  • One major advantage of the CRAFITY score is its simplicity. Both CRP and AFP are routinely available worldwide and do not require expensive molecular testing.
  • These findings challenge the current “one-size-fits-all” approach in first-line HCC treatment and suggest that not every patient may derive the same benefit from Atezo+Bev.
  • Before changing routine practice, prospective validation studies are required because this analysis was retrospective.
  • Nevertheless, the study provides one of the strongest signals to date that a simple clinical biomarker score may help personalize first-line therapy in advanced HCC.

Bottom line: In unresectable HCC patients with a CRAFITY score of 2, lenvatinib achieved superior progression-free survival compared with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, suggesting that CRAFITY may become a practical tool for first-line treatment selection.

Related Q&A

Liver Stiffness for HCC Risk in MASLD: Hepatology | July 2026

Introduction: Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is now the fastest-growing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because a substantial proportion of MASLD-related HCC develops before cirrhosis, better tools are needed to identify high-risk patients who...

Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Real-World HCC: JGH | May 2026

Introduction: The HIMALAYA trial established durvalumab plus tremelimumab (STRIDE) as a first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, many real-world patients do not meet the strict eligibility criteria of clinical trials. This multicenter study...

ALBI Grade and Sarcopenia in Unresectable HCC: IJG | July 2026

Introduction: Prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) depends not only on tumor burden but also on liver function and nutritional status. This study evaluated the prognostic value of ALBI grade, EZ-ALBI grade, and sarcopenia in...

HCC Surveillance Saves Lives: Frontline Gastroenterology | July 2026

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance enables earlier diagnosis and improves survival. This largest UK multicenter study evaluated how patients are diagnosed in routine clinical practice and identified major gaps in the surveillance pathway. Why was...

Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for HCC: The Lancet Regional Health | July 2026

Introduction: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 (Y90) glass microspheres is an established locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but guideline recommendations remain inconsistent. This large prospective multicenter study evaluated the real-world effectiveness, safety,...

Bleeding Risk with Immunotherapy in Advanced HCC: JHEP Reports | July 2026

Introduction: Atezolizumab–bevacizumab (A/B) and durvalumab–tremelimumab (STRIDE) are preferred first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because bevacizumab inhibits VEGF, concerns remain regarding bleeding and thromboembolic complications in patients with underlying cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Why...

GastroAGI Logo

We are pioneers in clinical intelligence, dedicated to helping gastroenterologists harness the power of artificial intelligence to drive precision, efficiency, and patient growth.

For You

For StudentsFor CliniciansFor ResearchersSoonFor Patients

Core Tools

MELD-Na ScoreChild-PughFIB-4 IndexGlasgow-BlatchfordBISAP Score

Explore

OverviewAboutCalculators
Trending Topics
Conference Briefings
Blog Insights
©GastroAGI 2026
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseMedical Disclaimer