GastroAGI Logo
OverviewBlogsAbout
Trending TopicsDaily BriefConference
Topics/Oncology/High FIT results in CRC patients and 1-year mortality outcomes
161

High FIT results in CRC patients and 1-year mortality outcomes

Clinical knowledge base written and curated by GastroAGI Team from primary medical literatureLast updated July 1, 2025

High fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are strongly associated with significantly worse 1-year mortality outcomes, according to the study. Below is a detailed breakdown of the key findings related to high FIT results and 1-year mortality outcomes:

1. Mortality Rates in High-FIT Group (FIT ≥ 10 µg Hb/g) vs Low-FIT Group (FIT < 10 µg Hb/g):

  • All-cause mortality:

  • Elevated FIT group: 8.3% mortality within 1 year.

  • Lower FIT group: 2.8% mortality within 1 year.

  • This represents a nearly threefold increase in 1-year mortality in the elevated FIT group compared to the lower FIT group.

  • All-cause mortality rate:

  • Elevated FIT group: 87.21 deaths per 1000 person-years.

  • Lower FIT group: 28.41 deaths per 1000 person-years.

  • Non-CRC mortality:

  • Elevated FIT group: 92.4% of all deaths in this group were non-CRC related.

  • Non-CRC mortality rate: 74.79 per 1000 person-years in the elevated FIT group vs 27.72 per 1000 person-years in the lower FIT group.

  • CRC-specific mortality: While mortality due to CRC increased with higher FIT levels, the majority of excess deaths in the elevated FIT group were attributed to non-CRC causes.


2. Adjusted Risk of Mortality (High FIT vs Low FIT):

  • After adjusting for factors such as age, sex, and year, patients with elevated FIT results (≥ 10 µg Hb/g) had:
  • Nearly double the risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.96).
  • 1.7 times higher risk of non-CRC mortality (aHR: 1.70).
  • These findings indicate that high FIT results are predictive of a systemic vulnerability to death beyond CRC alone.

3. Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMRs):

  • For patients with FIT ≥ 10 µg Hb/g:
  • SMR for all-cause mortality: 2.12 (indicating a more than twofold excess risk compared to the general population).
  • SMR for non-CRC mortality: 1.86 (indicating significantly higher risk of non-CRC-related deaths).

4. Demographic and Subgroup Insights:

  • Age: Younger symptomatic patients with elevated FIT results showed particularly pronounced relative increases in mortality risk, highlighting that high FIT is worrisome even in traditionally lower-risk age groups.
  • Sex differences: Women with elevated FIT results demonstrated a greater relative risk of mortality compared to men, suggesting potential biological or diagnostic differences.

5. Possible Mechanisms for Elevated Mortality in High-FIT Patients:

  • Elevated FIT results may signal underlying systemic health issues beyond CRC, such as:
  • Cardiovascular disease.
  • Other malignancies.
  • Inflammatory conditions or other comorbidities.
  • These conditions may contribute to the significantly higher non-CRC mortality observed in the elevated FIT group.

6. Clinical and Public Health Implications:

  • Red flag for overall mortality risk: A positive FIT result in symptomatic patients should not be viewed solely as a marker of CRC risk but as an indicator of increased overall mortality risk.
  • Comprehensive evaluation required: High-FIT patients should undergo urgent diagnostic workup and closer surveillance for both CRC and non-CRC conditions.
  • Prognostic utility: FIT may serve as a biomarker of systemic disease burden, providing prognostic insights beyond its traditional role in CRC detection.

7. Limitations of the Study:

  • The study was retrospective and conducted within a single regional healthcare system (Nottingham University Hospitals), which may limit generalizability to other populations. However, the large cohort size (49,889 adults) strengthens the robustness of the findings.

Summary:

High FIT results (≥ 10 µg Hb/g) in CRC patients are associated with significantly worse 1-year mortality outcomes, driven by both CRC-specific and non-CRC-related causes. The findings underscore the importance of interpreting elevated FIT results as a broad clinical red flag requiring comprehensive evaluation and management, not only for CRC but also for other underlying health risks.

Related Q&A

162

Encorafenib, Cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer

The combination of encorafenib, cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 has been studied as a first-line treatment for patients with BRAF V600E–mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), a particularly aggressive cancer subtype...

163

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan or Ramucirumab plus Paclitaxel in Gastric Cancer

The international, randomized phase 3 clinical trial compared trastuzumab deruxtecan with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line treatment options for patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma...

164

New Perioperative Strategy in Gastric Cancer

The new perioperative strategy in gastric cancer involves incorporating immunotherapy into the existing chemotherapy regimen to improve outcomes for patients with resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers. These...

165

CT Use and Future Cancer Risk

The rising use of CT (computed tomography) scans has sparked concerns about its potential long-term impact on cancer risk, as highlighted by a recent modeling study. Below is...

166

Four Key Genes Linked to Worse Gastric Cancer Outcomes

The four key genes linked to worse gastric cancer outcomes, as identified by new research from Brazil, are BRCA2, CDH1, RHOA, and TP53. Here’s a detailed breakdown of...

167

Catching Gastric Cancer early

Catching gastric cancer early is critically important for improving survival outcomes, especially given the poor prognosis associated with late-stage diagnosis. Early detection involves a structured, multidisciplinary approach that...

GastroAGI Logo

We are pioneers in clinical intelligence, dedicated to helping gastroenterologists harness the power of artificial intelligence to drive precision, efficiency, and patient growth.

For You

For StudentsFor CliniciansFor ResearchersSoonFor Patients

Core Tools

MELD-Na ScoreChild-PughFIB-4 IndexGlasgow-BlatchfordBISAP Score

Explore

OverviewAboutCalculators
Trending Topics
Conference Briefings
Blog Insights
©GastroAGI 2026
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseMedical Disclaimer