GastroAGI Logo
OverviewBlogsAbout
Trending TopicsConference
Topics/Oncology/Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Induced Diabetes in PD-1/PD-L1 Cancer Trials

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Induced Diabetes in PD-1/PD-L1 Cancer Trials

Clinical knowledge base curated and reviewed by GastroAGI TeamLast updated December 1, 2025

Quick Answer

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Induced Diabetes (ICI-D) is a rare yet serious immune-related adverse event that can arise in patients undergoing cancer immunotherapy, specifically in clinical trials involving programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) or programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Below is a detailed overview of findings related to ICI-D based on the evaluation of patients enrolled in National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) trials: ###...


Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Induced Diabetes (ICI-D) is a rare yet serious immune-related adverse event that can arise in patients undergoing cancer immunotherapy, specifically in clinical trials involving programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) or programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Below is a detailed overview of findings related to ICI-D based on the evaluation of patients enrolled in National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) trials:

### Study Overview:

  • **Objective:** To assess the distribution, incidence, and clinical characteristics of ICI-D among cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
  • **Data Source:** Adverse event reports from the NCI-CTEP database.
  • **Study Population:** 13,966 patients treated across 158 clinical trials between June 2015 and December 2022.
  • **Treatment Regimens:** Trials included PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy and combination immunotherapy regimens.

### Key Findings:

1. **Incidence:**

  • **Overall Incidence:** The cumulative incidence of ICI-D was **0.52 per 100 treated patients**, indicating that it is a rare adverse event.
  • **Variation by Treatment Setting:**
  • **Lower Risk:** Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy had significantly lower risk of developing ICI-D.
  • **Higher Risk:** Combination immunotherapy regimens were associated with a markedly higher incidence compared to PD-1 or PD-L1 monotherapy.

2. **Clinical Characteristics:**

  • **Hospitalization:** Most patients diagnosed with ICI-D required hospitalization.
  • **Intensive Care:** Nearly half of the patients required intensive care, highlighting the severity of the condition.
  • **Severe Hyperglycemia:** A key distinguishing feature of ICI-D was severe hyperglycemia, which set it apart from other causes of hyperglycemia such as pre-existing diabetes or metabolic disorders.

3. **Risk Factors:**

  • **Combination Immunotherapy:** Patients exposed to combination regimens involving multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors were at higher risk for ICI-D.
  • **Concurrent Chemotherapy:** Concurrent chemotherapy appeared to mitigate the risk of ICI-D compared to immunotherapy alone.

4. **Health Care Burden:**

  • Despite its rarity, ICI-D imposes a significant health care burden due to the need for extensive medical intervention, including hospitalizations and intensive care management.

### Clinical Implications:

  • **Recognition and Management:** Clinicians should be aware of ICI-D as a potential immune-related adverse event, especially when treating patients with combination immunotherapy regimens.
  • **Risk Assessment:** Identifying patients at higher risk based on treatment regimens can help guide monitoring strategies and improve clinical outcomes.
  • **Treatment Adjustments:** Concurrent chemotherapy may offer protective effects against ICI-D, suggesting potential avenues for optimizing treatment protocols.

### Conclusion:

ICI-D is an uncommon but highly morbid adverse event associated with PD-1/PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy. The risk varies significantly depending on the type of immunotherapy regimen and concurrent treatments. While rare, its severe clinical presentation and substantial health care burden underscore the need for heightened awareness, early diagnosis, and effective management strategies in clinical practice.

Related Q&A

KRAS ctDNA Predicts Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Therapy in PDAC: Annals of Surgery | July 2026

Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising noninvasive biomarker for monitoring treatment response and residual disease in solid tumors. However, its prognostic value during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma...

Low-Dose Aspirin for Lynch Syndrome: Lancet | July 2026

Introduction: Aspirin is one of the few interventions proven to reduce colorectal and other Lynch syndrome–associated cancers. The earlier CaPP2 trial established 600 mg daily aspirin as an effective chemopreventive strategy, but concerns regarding long-term...

4-Year Benefit of Durvalumab in BTC: JAMA Oncol | July 2026

Introduction: The TOPAZ-1 trial established durvalumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) as the first immunotherapy-based first-line standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, long-term survival outcomes and durability of benefit beyond...

The First Standardized PET Response Framework for Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Lancet Oncology | July 2026

Introduction: Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET/CT has become indispensable for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, until now, there has been no standardized method for assessing treatment response using SSTR PET imaging. This international...

Staging Laparoscopy in Gastric Cancer: Annals of Surgical Oncology | July 2026

Introduction: Staging laparoscopy (SL) is recommended for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer to detect occult peritoneal metastases before curative treatment. However, its real-world utilization across Europe remains uncertain. This large GASTRODATA study evaluated the...

Celecoxib Boosts Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H CRC : Lancet Oncol | Jul 2026

Introduction: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the management of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) locally advanced colorectal cancer, achieving unprecedented pathological response rates. Experimental evidence suggests that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition may enhance...

GastroAGI Logo

We are pioneers in clinical intelligence, dedicated to helping gastroenterologists harness the power of artificial intelligence to drive precision, efficiency, and patient growth.

For You

For StudentsFor CliniciansFor ResearchersSoonFor Patients

Core Tools

MELD-Na ScoreChild-PughFIB-4 IndexGlasgow-BlatchfordBISAP Score

Explore

OverviewAboutCalculators
Trending Topics
Conference Briefings
Blog Insights
©GastroAGI 2026
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseMedical Disclaimer