Introduction Endoscopic resection has evolved rapidly, with increasing emphasis on precision, safety, and complete lesion removal. While advances in techniques such as EMR and ESD have transformed outcomes, one fundamental aspect—snare selection—remains underappreciated.
Introduction
Endoscopic resection has evolved rapidly, with increasing emphasis on precision, safety, and complete lesion removal. While advances in techniques such as EMR and ESD have transformed outcomes, one fundamental aspect—snare selection—remains underappreciated. The physical properties of the snare, including wire thickness, stiffness, and shape, play a crucial role in determining cutting efficiency, tissue capture, and procedural success.
Problem Statement
In daily practice, snare selection is often based on personal preference rather than a structured, lesion-specific approach. This can lead to suboptimal resection, incomplete removal, or increased complications, particularly in challenging lesions such as flat, large, or fibrotic polyps. The lack of a standardised strategy results in variability in outcomes despite the availability of a wide range of devices.
Summary
A lesion-tailored approach to snare selection can significantly improve outcomes. Thin-wire snares enhance cutting efficiency and are ideal for cold techniques in small lesions, whereas thick-wire snares provide better grip for larger or fibrotic lesions. Soft snares adapt well to mucosa, while stiff snares offer better control in flat or large lesions. Similarly, snare shape influences effective tissue capture in different anatomical scenarios. Matching snare characteristics to lesion type—from diminutive polyps to large laterally spreading tumours—can optimise resection quality and safety. Moving toward a structured, evidence-informed snare selection strategy represents an important step in improving everyday endoscopic practice.
Introduction: Endoscopic metabolic therapies have emerged as less invasive alternatives to bariatric surgery for patients with obesity and poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The EndoBarrier duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopically placed...
Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage is the standard minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic necrotizing pancreatitis. However, the optimal timing of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) following drainage remains uncertain. While the conventional step-up approach reserves...
Introduction: Bevacizumab is widely used in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) because of its survival benefits but is associated with impaired wound healing, gastrointestinal perforation, and bleeding. These concerns often lead clinicians to delay endoscopic procedures...
Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of large colorectal neoplasms with excellent oncological outcomes. However, concerns about perforation have limited its widespread adoption. This large prospective multicenter study evaluated the incidence, risk...
Introduction: Obesity has become one of the greatest global health challenges. New incretin-based therapies—including semaglutide, tirzepatide, resmetirom, and SGLT2 inhibitors such as empagliflozin—have transformed the treatment of obesity, diabetes, and MASLD. However, many patients discontinue...
Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is the standard technique for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. Traditionally, biopsy specimens are processed for cytology, often requiring on-site cytopathology support. This multicenter prospective study evaluated whether directly placing...
We are pioneers in clinical intelligence, dedicated to helping gastroenterologists harness the power of artificial intelligence to drive precision, efficiency, and patient growth.