GastroAGI Logo
OverviewBlogsAbout
Trending TopicsConference
Topics/Endoscopy/Efficacy of PEG–Ascorbic Acid Plus Linaclotide vs Senna for Bowel Preparation (APPLE Trial)

Efficacy of PEG–Ascorbic Acid Plus Linaclotide vs Senna for Bowel Preparation (APPLE Trial)

Clinical knowledge base curated and reviewed by GastroAGI TeamLast updated January 1, 2025

Quick Answer

The APPLE trial (Efficacy of PEG–Ascorbic Acid Plus Linaclotide vs Senna for Bowel Preparation) was a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted across five centers in Japan. The study aimed to evaluate whether adding linaclotide to a low-volume bowel preparation regimen (polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid, 1L-PEG) improves bowel cleansing efficacy compared to senna.


The APPLE trial (Efficacy of PEG–Ascorbic Acid Plus Linaclotide vs Senna for Bowel Preparation) was a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted across five centers in Japan. The study aimed to evaluate whether adding linaclotide to a low-volume bowel preparation regimen (polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid, 1L-PEG) improves bowel cleansing efficacy compared to senna.

### Study Design:

  • **Participants**: A total of 1,464 outpatients scheduled for colonoscopy.
  • **Intervention Groups**:

1. **1L-PEG/AL**: 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid with 0.5 mg linaclotide.

2. **1L-PEG/AS**: The same regimen with 24 mg senna.

  • **Primary Endpoint**: Adequate bowel preparation assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).

### Key Findings:

1. **Efficacy**:

  • The linaclotide regimen (1L-PEG/AL) achieved significantly higher rates of adequate bowel preparation compared to the senna regimen (1L-PEG/AS): **92% vs 86%**.
  • Linaclotide showed superior overall and segmental BBPS scores.
  • The benefit of linaclotide was most pronounced in **high-risk patients** for inadequate bowel preparation, where adequacy reached **94%** with linaclotide compared to **86%** with senna.
  • In **low-risk patients**, both regimens performed equally well.

2. **Tolerability and Safety**:

  • Both regimens had similar tolerability, with comparable rates of side effects such as nausea, abdominal pain, sleep disturbances, and willingness to repeat the preparation.
  • Linaclotide led to an earlier onset of bowel movements and increased defecation before the intake of PEG, without increasing adverse events.

3. **Colonoscopy Outcomes**:

  • Colonoscopy completion rates, procedure times, and lesion detection rates were comparable between the two regimens.

### Conclusion:

The APPLE trial demonstrated that the linaclotide-enhanced low-volume bowel preparation regimen (1L-PEG/AL) provides **superior cleansing efficacy** compared to the senna regimen (1L-PEG/AS), particularly in high-risk patients, while maintaining similar safety and patient acceptability. Linaclotide represents a promising option for improving bowel preparation, especially in patients at high risk of inadequate cleansing.

Related Q&A

EndoBarrier Improves Diabetes and Weight Loss: Ann Surg | July 2026

Introduction: Endoscopic metabolic therapies have emerged as less invasive alternatives to bariatric surgery for patients with obesity and poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The EndoBarrier duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopically placed...

Immediate Endoscopic Necrosectomy in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Gastroenterology | July 2026

Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage is the standard minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic necrotizing pancreatitis. However, the optimal timing of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) following drainage remains uncertain. While the conventional step-up approach reserves...

Endoscopy After Bevacizumab Appears Safe: GIE | July 2026

Introduction: Bevacizumab is widely used in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) because of its survival benefits but is associated with impaired wound healing, gastrointestinal perforation, and bleeding. These concerns often lead clinicians to delay endoscopic procedures...

Colorectal ESD Perforation: Endoscopy | July 2026

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of large colorectal neoplasms with excellent oncological outcomes. However, concerns about perforation have limited its widespread adoption. This large prospective multicenter study evaluated the incidence, risk...

Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing REMAIN-1 Study: DDW | 2026

Introduction: Obesity has become one of the greatest global health challenges. New incretin-based therapies—including semaglutide, tirzepatide, resmetirom, and SGLT2 inhibitors such as empagliflozin—have transformed the treatment of obesity, diabetes, and MASLD. However, many patients discontinue...

EUS-FNAB for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: GIE | July 2026

Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is the standard technique for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. Traditionally, biopsy specimens are processed for cytology, often requiring on-site cytopathology support. This multicenter prospective study evaluated whether directly placing...

GastroAGI Logo

We are pioneers in clinical intelligence, dedicated to helping gastroenterologists harness the power of artificial intelligence to drive precision, efficiency, and patient growth.

For You

For StudentsFor CliniciansFor ResearchersSoonFor Patients

Core Tools

MELD-Na ScoreChild-PughFIB-4 IndexGlasgow-BlatchfordBISAP Score

Explore

OverviewAboutCalculators
Trending Topics
Conference Briefings
Blog Insights
©GastroAGI 2026
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseMedical Disclaimer