GastroAGI Logo
OverviewBlogsAbout
Trending TopicsDaily BriefConference
Topics/Endoscopy/Predicting endoscopic hemostasis failure in esophageal variceal bleeding
141

Predicting endoscopic hemostasis failure in esophageal variceal bleeding

Clinical knowledge base written and curated by GastroAGI Team from primary medical literatureLast updated May 1, 2025

The study aimed to develop and validate a predictive nomogram for assessing the risk of endoscopic hemostasis failure in cirrhotic patients presenting with acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB). EGVB is a severe complication of portal hypertension, with a high mortality rate, especially if endoscopic hemostasis fails. Conducted as a retrospective single-center study, 296 patients treated between January 2020 and February 2025 were analyzed. Patients were divided into successful (n=273) and failed (n=23) endoscopic hemostasis groups, with failure defined as rebleeding within five days or inability to control hemorrhage per Baveno VII criteria.

Four independent predictors of failure were identified: Shock Index (SI > 1.2), Red Color (RC) sign, active bleeding during endoscopy, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score. Using LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression, a nomogram was developed with the formula: Logit (P) = −3.548 + 1.695×SI + 2.303×RC sign + 1.785×Active bleeding + 0.46×CTP score. The nomogram demonstrated excellent predictive performance with an AUC of 0.890, outperforming traditional scoring systems like CTP, MELD, and Rockall.

Risk stratification classified patients into low, medium, and high-risk categories, with failure rates of 0%, 5.7%, and 19.2%, respectively. High-risk patients require ICU-level monitoring and immediate interventions such as secondary endoscopy, balloon tamponade, or TIPS in case of rebleeding. The study highlights the importance of hemodynamic stability (SI), endoscopic findings (RC sign and active bleeding), and liver function (CTP score) in predicting failure. While the nomogram showed promising results, the study’s single-center retrospective design limits external validation. Future research should incorporate imaging modalities and AI-driven analysis for enhanced precision.

Related Q&A

142

Purastat and its role Upper GI bleeding

Purastat is an innovative and promising hemostatic agent specifically designed for the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), particularly non-variceal UGIB. It is a synthetic peptide-based gel that...

143

Traction techniques in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)

Traction techniques in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) play a crucial role in improving procedural outcomes, safety, and feasibility, particularly in Western settings where ESD adoption has faced challenges....

144

Predicting mortality and readmission in UGIB

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of three pre-endoscopic scoring systems—Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS), AIMS65, and pre-endoscopic Rockall Score (pRS)—in predicting 30-day mortality and hospital readmission in patients...

145

Efficacy of 200 mg vs 1200 mg Simethicone with 3 L PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy.

This study compared the effectiveness of 200 mg versus 1200 mg simethicone (SIM) added to 3 L polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) for afternoon colonoscopy preparation. Conducted at...

146

A new horizon of endoscopic anti-reflux therapy

The new horizon of endoscopic anti-reflux therapy is exemplified by the emergence of Anti-Reflux Mucosal (ARM) interventions, which include anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS), mucosal ablation (ARMA), and mucoplasty (ARMP)....

147

ERCP Complications

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a critical therapeutic procedure for managing pancreaticobiliary diseases, but it is associated with significant risks. Below is a detailed overview of ERCP complications,...

GastroAGI Logo

We are pioneers in clinical intelligence, dedicated to helping gastroenterologists harness the power of artificial intelligence to drive precision, efficiency, and patient growth.

For You

For StudentsFor CliniciansFor ResearchersFor Patients

Core Tools

MELD-Na ScoreChild-PughFIB-4 IndexGlasgow-BlatchfordBISAP Score

Explore

OverviewAboutCalculators
Trending Topics
Conference Briefings
Blog Insights
©GastroAGI 2026
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseMedical Disclaimer